Essence Fest: Corporate Shine, Cultural Shadow
Trying to serve the culture while surviving the market — the impossible math of modern Black media
First things first: Essence is the most consequential Black media brand in the world. It’s the closest thing we have to a fully functional, multi-generational storytelling institution. That matters. And it’s why our critiques must be grounded in care. We want Essence to win—not as nostalgia, but as the home of the biggest, Blackest, most beautiful family reunion in the world.
But Essence is sailing in rough waters.
Consider this: Target—a festival sponsor—is under nationwide boycott for rolling back DEI commitments while celebrating Pride and Juneteenth in the same breath. The contradiction didn’t go unnoticed. To many, it felt like Essence had become a stage for corporate redemption arcs, not a sanctuary for cultural clarity. This isn’t about cancellation—it’s about discernment. The sponsors you platform reflect the values you protect.
And this isn’t happening in a vacuum.
The business model for legacy media is in freefall. The post-pandemic contraction of DEI, paired with the shifting currents of tech, distribution, and consumer behavior, have hit Black-led institutions especially hard. We know this firsthand.
Still, we have to distinguish the real breakdown from the surface-level noise. The critique that Essence is "too African" is ahistorical and unserious. We’ll deal with the so-called 'Diaspora Wars,' agent provocateurs, and trolls another time. For much of our adult lives, Essence was owned by Time Inc.—and no one seemed to mind. The relevant critique is not ethnicity, but ethos. It's not about who owns the brand. It's about whether they understand what it means to be responsible for a living cultural institution.
The real concern is pedigree. Essence is being steered by corporate executives who may excel at translating Black culture for boardrooms or scaling product-based businesses—but media isn’t widgets. The product is the culture. It’s emotional, symbolic, high-context work. And it requires cultural operators, not just business leaders.
As Van Lathan pointed out, there’s a fundamental tension between Black culture and corporate interests. Black culture—especially Black American culture—is often a spiritual and creative response to systemic trauma. It exists in tension with power. So when a corporate sponsor like AT&T imposes guardrails that discourage discussion of race, gender, or critique of institutions, it doesn’t just sanitize the programming—it contradicts the very spirit of what Essence Fest was built to celebrate.
A Note From the Editors:
We’ve moved CRWNMAG to Substack No algorithms, no dilution. Just real, direct conversation with our people. If this piece speaks to you, pledge your support. You won’t be charged today, but you’ll be first in line when we go paid.
The Soul of the Matter
The Transformative Nature of Black Culture
Black culture is not just style or content—it is the practice of building something beautiful and free in a country that was never designed for our freedom. It challenges norms. It speaks truth. It pushes.Culture vs. Corporation
Corporate logic demands predictability. Cultural expression delivers disruption. These logics are in conflict. And when push comes to shove, culture usually loses.Sponsorship as Control
The leaked sponsor language reveals the danger: avoid race, gender, critique, or divisive framing. But what is Black storytelling if not a confrontation with those very realities?Boycott vs. Black Business
Rich Dennis defended the partnership with Target on The Breakfast Club, citing a long-standing contract and a more complex reality: many of his portfolio companies, built through the New Voices Fund, rely heavily on Target for distribution. With sales down and margins tight, the boycott poses not just a political tension—but an economic threat to the very businesses Essence was designed to uplift.
This is the real rub: boycotts can spark awareness, but they’re not a substitute for economic infrastructure. Often, they function more as catharsis than coordinated strategy. Without a parallel plan to build or protect the systems they disrupt, they risk collapsing the very ground under our feet. Dennis didn’t say it outright, but his track record makes the point plain: protest can spotlight injustice, but ownership moves the needle. In a capitalist environment, economic advancement isn’t a bonus — it’s the baseline.
The boycott isn’t necessarily wrong. But the conversation, as it stands, is incomplete—and it mirrors a deeper uncertainty at the heart of Essence itself: who is it really for?
Part of what’s at stake here is Essence’s generational identity. As Kenny Burns put it, Essence Fest is a movement "where generationally you could show up together." Its core demo is 40 to 60—Black families, matriarchs, elders, and the grown children who come home to culture. That center has gravity. Yes, younger audiences love the music—but they don’t carry the same cultural legacy. And more importantly, their favorite acts couldn’t fill the Superdome on their own. Shifting the festival’s focus in hopes of chasing a younger audience isn’t just a risky bet—it’s a fundamental misunderstanding of what makes Essence what it is.
And when that cultural center is ignored, the drift begins.
As Rachel Lindsay notes, there’s a predictable lifecycle to cultural institutions. They begin soulful, layered, and alive. And over time—if not carefully protected—they calcify. What was once connective becomes performative. What was once ours becomes everyone’s.
Essence doesn’t need a rebrand. It needs a recalibration. Not to return to the past, but to protect the soul of the thing while navigating its scale. That takes strategy, cultural fluency, and structural imagination.